alternativekasce.blogg.se

• #DNC SERVER MISSING FULL#

Most infamously, when asked at a press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin about Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, Trump responded by invoking the missing-server conspiracy theory.

#DNC SERVER MISSING FULL#

It’s a publicly traded company with many different investors.) In the same interview, he said Crowdstrike and the DNC didn’t allow the FBI to “see the server.” (There wasn’t just one server, and the FBI has said it got full access to the forensic information it needed to conduct an investigation.) Trump told the Associated Press in 2017 that Crowdstrike was owned by “a very rich Ukrainian.” (It’s not.

Russia continues to say they had nothing to do with Meddling in our Election! Where is the DNC Server, and why didn’t Shady James Comey and the now disgraced FBI agents take and closely examine it? Why isn’t Hillary/Russia being looked at? So many questions, so much corruption! The Rigged Witch Hunt, originally headed by FBI lover boy Peter S (for one year) & now, 13 Angry Democrats, should look into the missing DNC Server, Crooked Hillary’s illegally deleted Emails, the Pakistani Fraudster, Uranium One, Podesta & so much more. ….Where is the DNC Server, and why didn’t the FBI take possession of it? Deep State? Since taking office, Trump has tweeted close to a dozen times about the fictional “missing server” - indeed, it appears to be one of his go-to conspiracy theories. As we’ve stated before, we stand by our findings and conclusions that have been fully supported by the US Intelligence community.”īut conspiracy theorists rarely let facts get in the way, and the unhinged story about Crowdstrike and the “missing server” percolated on the right until it reached the president himself. The voluminous results of the FBI’s investigation can be found in Robert Mueller’s indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers for carrying out the DNC hack as well as the final Mueller report.Ĭrowdstrike sent a statement to Rolling Stone on Wednesday stating that “with regards to our investigation of the DNC hack in 2016, we provided all forensic evidence and analysis to the FBI. Then-FBI Director James Comey testified that the bureau received from the DNC what he called an “appropriate substitute” for the servers and internet architecture in question. the adversary's movement in situ (network logs)īy all indications, the FBI got what it needed from the DNC and Crowdstrike. disk images of many machines *in the network* This DNC-didn't-give-the-server-to-the-FBI idea makes no sense. Thomas Rid, a cybersecurity expert and professor at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies, has pointed out that the FBI didn’t need the servers themselves to fully investigate the DNC hack: For starters, there is no single “server.” As Robert Mueller would later disclose, the DNC was forced to decommission more than 140 servers after the Russia hack. If Russia didn’t hack the DNC, then the controversy around Russia’s efforts to elect Trump in 2016 would go away. The underlying motivation of those supporting this theory (including Trump himself) is to deny that Russia carried out the DNC hacking scandal. In Trump’s regurgitating of this theory to the Ukrainian president he also seemed to suggest that the DNC server in question had ended up in Ukraine because, as Trump has falsely claimed, Crowdstrike has Ukrainian owners.

This theory claims that because the DNC and Crowdstrike didn’t give the FBI the “server” that was hacked, that was evidence of a cover-up.

On the far-right fringes, however, a conspiracy theory formed that Crowdstrike was somehow part of a Deep State plot to wrongly blame Russia for the DNC hack.